Razer Blade 14 Vs. MacBook Pro 14

The 14-inch PC has become progressively well known as of late by offering a bigger presentation than 13-inch machines in a lot more modest case than 15-inch and bigger PCs. What's more, two of the best are the Razer Blade 14 and the Apple MacBook Pro 14.

The Blade 14 had its spot at the first spot on our list of best gaming workstations, offering unimaginable execution in a smooth skeleton that no other gaming machine can coordinate. Simultaneously, the MacBook Pro 14 has overwhelmed the market thanks to its unquestionably quick Apple M1 Pro and M1 Max CPUs that additionally offer the absolute best battery duration around. It sits at the first spot on our list of best 14-inch workstations. Which of these exceptional 14-inch workstations is ideal for you?

Specs Razer Blade 14 Apple MacBook Pro 14 Dimensions 12.59 inches x 8.66 inches x 0.66 inches 12.31 inches x 8.71 inches x 0.61 inches Weight 3.92 pounds 3.5 pounds Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX Apple M1 ProApple M1 Max Graphics Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Integrated RAM 16GB 16GB32GB64GB Display 14.0-inch Full HD (1,920 x 1,080) IPS 144Hz14.0-inch QHD (2,560 x 1,440) IPS 165Hz 14.2-inch 16:10 Liquid Retina XDR 3,024 x 1,964 Storage 1TB strong state drive 512GB SSD1TB SSD2TB SSD4TB SSD8TB SSD Touch Optional No Ports 2 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 22 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 21 x HDMI 2.13.5mm sound jack 3x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4HDMI 2.03.5mm sound jackSD card peruser Wireless Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0 Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0 Webcam 720p 1080p Operating framework Windows 10 Home MacOS Monterey Battery 61.6 watt-hour 70 watt-hour Price $1,800+ $1,999+ Rating 4.5.

The Razer Blade 14 follows a similar moderate, all-dark stylish as the remainder of the reach, with straightforward lines and just a green snake logo on the top, adding some sprinkle. Truth be told, it could be said that its plan objective is to match the Apple MacBook's downplayed tastefulness. Beyond its silver variety conspire, the MacBook Pro 14 seems to be the Blade 14 (or maybe it's the reverse way around), with a comparative moderate stylish that evades any bling. Both are alluring machines, and picking between them boils down to an inclination in variety.

The two PCs are additionally amazingly very much assembled, built from CNC machined aluminum. You won't track down any bowing, flexing, or turning in one or the other PC — they're both among the best-constructed PCs you can purchase. This is one more standard that doesn't help with picking between the two.

Notwithstanding, with regards to the console, there's an unmistakable differentiation. Without a doubt, the Blade 14 has per-key RGB lighting with 15 degrees of splendor and an agreeable plan with enormous keycaps and a lot of dispersing. The switches are additionally excellent and rank among the best you'll find on a Windows PC. Nonetheless, the MacBook Pro 14 advantages from Apple's Magic Keyboard, which supplanted the butterfly console, a wellspring of colossal discussion on prior MacBooks. The Magic Keyboard doesn't have a huge load of movement, yet its switches are unquestionably exact with the ideal lining activity, making for the best console you can get on a PC on any stage.

The touchpad is one more particular win for the MacBook Pro 14. Its huge Force Touch haptic touchpad is touchy, answers taps on each square millimeter of its smooth surface, thus intently impersonates a physical touchpad that you can't differentiate. The Blade 14's touchpad is excellent for a Windows PC, yet it can't match the Macbook's.

Network likewise inclines toward the MacBook Pro 14. It offers three USB-C ports with Thunderbolt 4 help, a HDMI 2.0 port, a 3.5mm sound jack, and a SD card peruser. The Blade 14 has two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, two USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 ports (without Thunderbolt 4 help thanks to the AMD chipset), a HDMI 2.1 port, and a 3.5mm sound jack. There's no SD card peruser accessible, which is disheartening. The two PCs offer Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0 for remote network.


Profoundly/16-string chip that gives probably the best processor execution in Windows machines. In our survey unit, the Ryzen CPU was matched with a Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 GPU. You can arrange the Blade 14 with up to a RTX 3080 for extraordinarily quick GPU execution in a generally little bundle. We checked on the MacBook Pro 16 with the Apple M1 Pro with a 10-center CPU (eight execution centers and two productivity centers) and a 16-center GPU, which is accessible in the MacBook Pro 14, and both can be arranged with up to a M1 Max with a 10-center CPU and a 32-center GPU. For this correlation, we'll expect that the MacBook Pro 14 will be somewhat more slow than the 16-inch form yet that the presentation scores would be adequately close to reach a few inferences.

In Cinebench R23, a delivering benchmark that is CPU-concentrated, the Blade 14 scored 1,434 in single-center mode and 11,226 in multi-center mode. That is a quick score for a Windows PC. The MacBook Pro 16 with the M1 Pro scored 1,531 and 12,343, separately. Taking into account a slight decline with the MacBook Pro 14 makes the two PCs equally matched in this benchmark. Design the MacBook Pro 14 with the M1 Max, nonetheless, and it will be altogether quicker.

In reality Pugetbench Premiere Pro benchmark, which runs in a live adaptation of Adobe Premiere Pro, the MacBook Pro 16 with the M1 Pro scored 956 contrasted with the Blade 14's 537. That is a great outcome, in any event, accepting the MacBook Pro 14 is somewhat more slow. Debut Pro can exploit discrete GPUs, and the RTX 3070 is quicker than the M1 Pro's incorporated GPU.

The main region where the Blade 14 will have an unmistakable exhibition advantage is in gaming. Assuming you need a PC that is quick for both inventive work and for gaming, then, at that point, Razer's PC is a strong decision. Be that as it may, assuming you're completely a maker, the MacBook Pro 14 will give better generally speaking execution. Note that Razer has as of late presented a Blade 14 with the new AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX CPU that is probably going to be fundamentally quicker than the variant we checked on, however we don't yet have benchmarks on that machine.


The Blade 14 has two showcase choices, a 14.0-inch Full HD (1,920 x 1,080) IPS board running at 144Hz and a 14.0-inch QHD (2560 x 1440) IPS screen running at 165Hz. We surveyed the last option, and it gave wide and genuinely precise tones at 90% of AdobeRGB and 100 percent of sRGB with an exactness of DeltaE 1.54 (1.0 or less is thought of as magnificent). Notwithstanding, its splendor was somewhat low at 315 nits, and its differentiation was additionally low at 830:1 (we like to see 1,000:1 or more). It's an extraordinary presentation for gamers, particularly given the quick 165Hz invigorate rate, yet it probably won't give the variety exactness and differentiation that makers look for.

The MacBook Pro 14 has only one showcase choice, a 14.2-inch Liquid Retina XDR show (little LED) at 3024 x 1964 running at 120Hz. We'll expect that it gives a similar quality as the MacBook Pro 16's presentation, which is bigger however utilizes a similar innovation. That show gave 475 nits of brilliance, 95% of AdobeRGB and 100 percent of sRGB with a precision of 1.04, and a 475,200:1 difference proportion for inky blacks.

The MacBook Pro 14's presentation is great for makers and any other individual who needs a brilliant and variety precise showcase with profound differentiation. It additionally profits by its 16:10 perspective proportion that is more efficiency agreeable than the Razer 14's outdated 16:9 angle proportion.


In width and profundity, the Blade 14 and MacBook Pro 14 are inside parts of an inch of one another. The MacBook is somewhat more slender at 0.61 inches versus 0.66 inches and lighter at 3.5 pounds versus 3.92 pounds. The two workstations are already slim and light to haul around without crushing your spirit, and they're close enough that you probably wouldn't have the option to differentiate.

Battery duration is another matter completely, notwithstanding. The Blade 14 endured 8.25 hours in our web perusing test that cycles through a progression of famous and complex sites and 11 hours on our video test that circles a neighborhood Full HD Avengers trailer. Those aren't terrible scores for a Windows gaming PC. Notwithstanding, the MacBook Pro 14 will keep going altogether longer on a charge. The MacBook Pro 16 came to 18.5 hours in our web perusing test and 23 hours in our video test. As indicated by Apple, the 14-inch MacBook ought to get three hours less in web perusing and four hours less in video playback. Going by those numbers, the MacBook Pro 14 should keep going for around 15 hours in our web perusing test and 19 hours in our video test.

That is two times the life span from the MacBook Pro 14. You get a huge load of force with unimaginable battery duration from Apple's machine, and the Blade 14 can't keep up.

The MacBook Pro 14 is the better all over PC

The Razer Blade 14 has a section level cost of $2,000 for a Ryzen 9 6900HX, 16GB of RAM, a 1TB strong state drive (SSD), a Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060, and a 14-inch Full HD 144Hz showcase. At the top end, you'll burn through $3,500 for a Ryzen 9 6900HX, 16GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, a RTX 3080 Ti, and a 14-inch QHD 165Hz showcase. It's anything but a cheap PC using any and all means.

The MacBook Pro 14 beginnings at $1,999 with a 8-center CPU/16-center GPU M1 Pro, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. You can spend as much as an astounding $5,899 for a 10-center CPU/32-center GPU M1 Max, 64GB of RAM, and an enormous 8TB SSD. The MacBook Pro 14 territories from an unmistakably superior PC to an unbelievably costly machine.

Assuming that you're a gamer who needs a quick machine for efficiency and innovativeness, then, at that point, the Razer Blade 14 is an incredible choice. Be that as it may, for most clients, especially makers, the MacBook Pro 14 offers better all over execution, outstanding battery duration, and a greatly improved show, making it the general champ.

Post a Comment (0)
Previous Post Next Post


Random Products